The bag is underrated in the photo, it is much nicer than it looks. Spacious and generally value for money, as it is possibly the most honest in terms of money and construction quality for a 60-liter bag. It seems that it is not the most comfortable for shoulders and back during transportation, so if you want it for hiking, it is better to choose another one. But for trips where you won't have to walk long distances with the bag on your back, it is the best.

The most value for money backpack that is available, its quality is excellent, I would recommend it to everyone

I have had it for 6-7 years for short hikes. No wear and tear. Materials and construction are very satisfactory. I know there are lighter options, but with significantly higher prices. Besides, a 0.5 kilo difference in the materials of a 60-liter backpack is rather insignificant when considering the weight it carries. It should be noted that it was also used for long hikes in the rain, with the included waterproof cover. Some clothes got slightly wet, but overall the contents remained in an acceptable condition. However, if it is to be used in the rain, I recommend covering it with a waterproof poncho (designed for travelers and backpacks together)

I haven't had it for long enough to properly comment on its quality, but it seems decent and not cheaply made.
It has plenty of space and solutions for equipment attachment, and the pockets are very helpful.
For a short trip (3-7 days), it is perfect, depending on the season and clothing/item needs. It is great for those who travel with few things, and also for those who carry more.
Certainly, it is not the most comfortable or ergonomic backpack for walking, hiking, etc., but it is not bad for simple trips, especially if you don't want to carry many things and don't need durability in tough conditions.
For its price, it is definitely worth it, and aesthetically it is nicer than it appears in the photo.