Selected Store
Skroutz Buyers Protection
Set the delivery location to see products according to your choice.
© 20[0-9]{2} Skroutz SA All Rights and Lefts reserved. FAQ | Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy
Key features:
Selected Store
Skroutz Buyers Protection
You can return your order for free, easily and quickly.
Learn morePrices are calculated for:Malta, Other Payment Options
The Clifton 8 offers explosive performance and is made with a lighter midsole and the same riding characteristics as previous models. The Clifton 8 features an improved design and a revamped upper made from premium mesh. The new midsole composition provides one of the lightest, most energetic foams to date.
Specifications are collected from official manufacturer websites. Please verify the specifications before proceeding with your final purchase. If you notice any problem you can report it here.
Owner for about a year, I must have run/walked close to a 4-digit number of kilometers. The soles are impeccable and absorb all shocks, they are very comfortable both for running and walking. The only downside is their build quality for the money they cost. The heel has completely worn out and the shoes are ready to be thrown away. I would gladly buy them again.
After the Bondi, the Clifton is the best choice among many other athletic shoes. I am a swimmer, but for the walking I do, I consider the Clifton and the Bondi to be perfect.
Excellent for walking and standing at work. You fly.
I have experience with expensive Asics models.
We will see about durability.
First time with Hoka and I am very satisfied! My size is 43.3 and 250 grams. Pleasant daily trainer for comfortable kilometers, with nice shock absorption for easy-moderate runs. Overall, it is for "slow runs" although I tried it up to a pace of 4'10/km and it had no problem. If it lasts for 1000 kilometers, which is the benchmark for my running shoes, then we are clearly talking about value for money! Edit 23/8/23: I am uploading photos from the 1,000 kilometers and the shoe is great! The cushioning remains good and the fabric is intact without any tears! Edit 20/12/23: I retired them at 1600 kilometers and now I only wear them for walks. They still look great except for the slightly worn out sole, but the fabric has no tears!
Impressive, beautiful, stunning, lightweight, I didn't feel the slightest pain in my knees, 10 km but it kills you in the arch and a little in the sole, ideal only for a narrow foot and high arch
Unfortunately, the build quality is not as expected for their price. After 5 months of light use, there seems to be an issue with the internal lining of the heel
They are very comfortable, stable for running, but I would say only for winter, too warm for spring and summer.
Very good quality materials. Quite soft (compared to Asics Novablast 3, no comparison)
Good shoe. I had them in size 7!
I usually wear size 43.
The previous ones in size 44 never hurt me. I decided to try size 43.5, initially they hurt me a little. However, after a few workouts, they are okay and fit better on the foot.
Prefer a size larger than your normal size.
Anyway, their comfort is incomparable.
Δεν γνώριζα για την ύπαρξη της συγκεκριμένης μάρκας.Τα είδα σε προσφορά (85) κ είπα να τα δοκιμάσω.Να σημειώσω ότι τα πήρα σε μέγεθος των υπολοίπων αθλητικών που έχω Asics nike κ είναι ακριβώς το ίδιο,παρόλο που αρκετοί γράφουν στα σχόλια ότι ήθελαν παραπάνω μέγεθος.Τα χρησιμοποιώ για τρέξιμο 10χλμ κ περπατημα κ είναι πραγματικά εξαιρετικά.Ελφρια,άνετα,κ πολύ μαλακά στο πάτημα.Επισης είναι κ πανέμορφα.
Θελω να αρχισω λεγοντας οτι ειναι πολυ ανετα παπουτσια και οτι τα συνιστω με καποιες προυποθεσεις.
Εχω τρεξει γυρω στα 50χλμ (στο πλαισιο προπονησης για ημιμαραθωνιο) σε αυτα τα παπουτσια και αρχισα να παρατηρω οτι με ποναει ελαφρως το γονατο. Μετα απο αρκετο ψαξιμο, ανακαληψα οτι τα παπουτσια τυπου Rocker, ενω μειωνουν τις δυναμεις που ασκουνται στο πελμα, μπορει να αυξησουν τις δυναμεις που ασκουνται στα γονατα.
Ετσι, θα προτεινα για οσους τα αγορασουν να εχουν στο νου τους οτι δεν ειναι παπουτσι το οποιο το βαζεις πρωτη φορα και τρεχεις. Θελεις χρονο να το συνηθησεις για να αποφυγεις τυχων τραυματισμους.
Δε θα τα ξανα αγοραζα (90 ε) και θα πηγαινα σε κατι πιο κλασικο εστω και πιο ακριβο. (πχ Pegagus, Kayano / Οχι rocker για καθημερινη προπονηση)
Edit: Μετα απο λιγες εβδομαδες χρησης μπορω να πω οτι ειναι απο τα πιο ανετα παπουτσια που εχω δοκιμασει. Παντα υπαρχει η παραπανω επιφυλαξη ομως.
The most stable and convenient thing I have ever worn on my feet.
From now on, I doubt if I can wear anything inferior to these...
Στην αρχή αντιμετώπισα μεγάλο πρόβλημα στην καμάρα. Με ενοχλούσαν πολύ.
Έπειτα από 100 περίπου χλμ χρήσης έχουν στρώσει κάπως, βέβαια η φθορά τους είναι εμφανής.
Μάλλον δεν θα ξαναπροτιμήσω την συγκεκριμένη μάρκα...
Βέβαια πάντα πιστεύω ότι τα κάθε παπούτσι δεν μπορεί να ταιριάζει το ίδιο δε διαφορετικά πόδια, οπότε είναι και θέμα πως θα σου κάτσει.
Bought for 80.40 euros. Shoe for medium distances, good fabric with breathability but a big downside is that it is very hard, plus the holes in the laces make angles and rub on the foot and the issue is that all the shoes I have from the company have the same issue, unacceptable. Now the tongue has elastic and it is tight and it saddens me when walking, the heel has protection and does not hit. The sole is very good and soft, withstands hard training and running. It is very good on all terrains.
I use the running shoes for 8-10 hours at work for orthostasis and for everyday use. I do not use them for running, and the following review will be based on these uses.
From the Bondi 7, I found the Clifton 8 on a good offer and decided to try it. They look very similar as shoes. The Bondi just has a little more room in the toes and is softer to step on, but that doesn't mean the Clifton lacks in shock absorption. It is actually very good. The Bondi took about 10 days to break in, while this one, maybe because it is lighter and softer in its materials, felt great from the first moment I wore it.
I don't have an opinion on their durability... but I can say that the sole has a very good grip on dry surfaces.
Anyone looking for shoes for work and orthostasis, buying the Clifton (or even the Bondi) will definitely not be disappointed.
During the first 3 workouts, until my foot got used to the hard plastic in the arch area, I experienced a lot of pain to the point where I was considering withdrawing them. I gave them another chance and I didn't regret it. Excellent shock absorption, velvety tread.
I tried them on in the store and immediately they bothered me in the fitting room, they feel like a knife, I have never felt this way in any other shoe... so I believe it is a manufacturing issue. (regular fitting room)
I have run approximately 550km and they have started to feel a bit tired. It is a good running shoe that will happily accompany you on your runs, but we're not talking about a fast tempo. At a steady pace, they are quite stable and comfortable, but I have the impression that the previous generation, Clifton 7, was better, and this is always my personal opinion. Each foot feels it differently, and this is always subjective. Overall, it is a good shoe, but not for high demands (at least compared to the previous series) that you will love to have with you on your enjoyable runs. However, I would still give the new generation, Clifton 9, a chance to see the change that Hoka claims
I bought them solely for my job. I have several hours of standing and my feet were really relaxed... They are worth their money.
It's not as cushioned as the Clifton 6 that I had, but it's okay. Let's hope they are at least as durable.
It is the 6th pair in a row, by far the best for running and long distances. Also, it is great for people with weight like me, I am 100 kilograms and I have never complained about knee, foot, or waist discomfort
After 2 months of training, I believe it is the suitable shoe for someone who has problems with their feet
I wanted to finally try a Hoka and I got the Clifton 8.
1. I ran 6km on dry asphalt. They are lightweight with great shock absorption but they caused discomfort in the arch of my foot, especially on the right sole. After a while, you get used to it but it's not pleasant.
2. I ran 9km on wet asphalt, after rain, like morning humidity.
Their performance was very poor, they were slippery. Poor grip, you lose your "pace".
From 5.5 to 6.5! Not recommended for wet ground.
As correctly stated here, the shoe is NOT intended for individuals with wide feet. On the contrary, it is great for individuals with neutral feet or high arches. Unfortunately, I fell for it as some websites mention that the shoe is suitable for people with wide feet. Okay, it's not that it's unbearable, but there are much better shoes for individuals with this specific foot morphology.
This is a very good running shoe.
It is for the high arch category, meaning it provides special support for the arch for people with high arches.
It is NOT suitable for people with flat feet.
The construction quality is well-known Hoka, good grip, and personally, I find it very stylish.
Ideal for training and for runners with relatively high weight.
Recommended!
For the expensive running categories,
After Adidas "discomfort in the ankles",
After Asics tight fit fatigue almost throughout the body,
Nike Air Winflow 6 and
Nike Air Pegasus 37 are perfectly comfortable for the body ALL day in motion and standing for over 14 hours a day?!!!!!!!
This week I am trying the HOKA Clide Clifton 8...
First experience GOOD a little more elevated but stable step from the second Tuesday absorption of shocks uniform pressure depending on the change of the body's center of gravity balance... etc.
For starters, the first impressions! (POSITIVE)!!!
I bought them thinking that I was investing in a good athletic shoe....BIG MISTAKE....I wasted 150€!!!! It caused me a huge problem in my heel....
WARNING! This shoe is designed for individuals with a high arch. It has a rigid arch support that tightly presses against the foot. I wonder how marathon runners can wear such shoes, especially those with a normal arch. What good are the 24mm sole thickness at the forefoot when my arch is stepping on a ping pong ball! After a quick search, I found that there are others facing the same issue, even running shoe critics mention it. After just 15 km, I had to withdraw for fear of getting injured. It's a shame for the 100 euros, but above all, it's about health!
Το παπούτσι τα σπάει. Η αξιολόγηση μου είναι υποκειμενική καθώς το παπούτσι αγοράστηκε για χρήση με τρέξιμο σε διάδρομο γυμναστικής και βόλτα. Είναι άνετο, ανάλαφρο με φοβερό πάτημα και τόσο ξεκούραστο που αισθάνεσαι κατά τη βάδιση λες και σου κάνει μασάζ στο πέλμα. Στο νούμερο του εκεί που φοράω 42 αυτό που αγοράστηκε με βάση κριτικές άλλον και έκατσε τέλεια είναι το 43 1/3.
Τρέχω περίπου 10χλμ τη φορά σε άσφαλτο, δεν θα μπω σε λεπτομέρειες, θεωρώ γενικά ότι είναι φοβερό παπούτσι, το καλύτερο που έχω δοκιμάσει, ειδικά στα 80 ευρώ που ήταν σε προσφορά.
After 25 years of running, I have to say the following: I have worn many good shoes over the years that I have been involved in running as a hobby. Everyone's opinion is personal depending on the usage and consistency in what they do. For me, there is no more honest training shoe than the Hoka Glifton. It has everything I could ask for, it is lightweight, cushioned, shock-absorbing, and very durable. Especially with the Glifton 8, I have done over 1,500 kilometers and still feel great in them. At the usual price of 100-110 euros, there is no more honest shoe. Because I participate in races from time to time, I have noticed that Hoka is now the number one company for medium and long distances. Hoka has learned and now more than 60% of runners wear them.