One of the worst tires I have ever tried (compared to Dunlop, Vrederstein, Bridgestone). Cheap and relatively decent on dry roads, quite bad on wet roads. Very noisy, especially at speeds above 90-100 km/h. But the worst part is that after 2.5 years and about 20,000 km, the tires were ready to be thrown away. It's better for someone to spend an extra 50-80 euros on a set to get a reputable, durable, and more reliable tire.

Although it is the beginning, the first impressions are positive. Compared to the previous ones I had, Kormoran, the differences are evident from the first day. Viking is a subsidiary of Continental, which is characterized by its soft tires, so it maintains it here as well. We have a soft tire that warms up quickly and performs above average in dry and wet braking. The choice was first economical and secondly I wanted a soft tire because its use is 90% in the city, starting and stopping. Traveling once or twice a year, at a reasonable speed of 120-140 kilometers per hour, which suits me perfectly. I will come back again in a few months to see how it performs.

Up Date 15/01/2020

After 2 months and 2000 kilometers driving within the city, on both dry and wet roads, the tire performs very well, I would say always considering the cost of purchase. If I had a branded tire, I don't think I would even notice it. And of course, I remind you that the driving conditions are stop-start traffic lights and a speed that reaches 80 km daily. On the highway, of course, 120 is a reasonable number, but for a minimal period of time, and even there, the behavior is impeccable. I should also mention that there has been no emergency maneuver to see the tire's reaction (yet). These are a few things, and at some point, I will also mention how it performs on a trip.